タイトル
Vol.43 No.6 contents Japanese/English

download PDFFull Text of PDF (102K)
Article in Japanese

- Original Article -

Postoperative Exercise Tolerance After Extended Segmentectomy -Analysis Based on a Conventional Treadmill Test-

Hiroaki Harada1, Wataru Nishio1, Morihito Okada1, Toshihiko Sakamoto1, Kazuya Uchino1, Kenji Tsuboshima1, Hidehito Matsuoka2, Noriaki Tsubota1
1Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo Medical Center for Adults, Japan, 2Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Kaibara Hospital, Japan

Objective. Since 1992, we have performed limited resection-extended segmentectomy-for patients suspected of having peripheral lung tumors less than 2 cm on chest roentgenograms and with no evidence of metastasis through routine examinations. We already reported that the outcome of extended segmentectomy is comparable to that of lobectomy, and the postoperative functional loss of extended segmentectomy is small. However, controversy about the postoperative functional advantage of limited surgery over standard lobectomy for lung cancer still continues. The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent of reduction of maximal oxygen consumption after extended segmentectomy compared with lobectomy. Patients and Methods. An exercise test was performed preoperatively and two months after surgery to compare the effects of the procedure in 46 patients who underwent extended segmentectomy and 156 who underwent lobectomy. Results. Patients who were treated by extended segmentectomy retained 87.2±0.2% of their preoperative VO2max/BW, whereas the lobectomy group retained only 78.8±0.1% (p< 0.0001). Also in the analysis for each lobe, the extended segmentectomy group retained significantly better exercise tolerance than the lobectomy group. Conclusions. At several months after surgery, better exercise tolerance was retained in patients who had undergone extended segmentectomy than those who had undergone lobectomy.
key words: Pulmonary resection, Limited resection, Exercise test, VO2max, Extended segmentectomy

Received: March 14, 2003
Accepted: July 28, 2003

JJLC 43 (6): 705-710, 2003

ページの先頭へ