 |
Vol.52 No.6 contents | Japanese/English |
 | Full Text of PDF (1050K) Article in Japanese |
- The 25th Lung Cancer Mass Screening Seminar -
Prevalance Rate of Low-dose CT Lung Cancer Screening: Results of a Questionnaire Survey of Member Facilities of Japan Society of Ningen Dock with Special Concerns Regarding the Actual Status and Disincentives for Implementing Such Screening
Hirotaka Takizawa1,21Director, Portsquare Kashiwado Clinic, Kashiwado Memorial Foundation, Japan, 2Chairman, Executive Subcommitee for Promotion of Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening, Japan Society of Ningen Dock, Japan
Objective. We conducted a survey of member facilities of the Japan Society of Ningen Dock to elucidate the actual status of chest computed tomography (CT) screening and the reasons for not being able to change to low-dose CT. Methods. We sent a questionnaire consisting of 9 items to 531 member facilities in July 2010, response by facsimile to obtain an analysis. Results. The prevalence rate of low-dose CT lung cancer screening slightly increased to 35% in comparison with the former survey done in November 2008. Some facilities indicated some shift in tube current to a lower range even though this was insufficient to meet the definition of low-dose CT. This reflects their thinking of "Even with knowledge, there is strong hesitation to change to low-dose CT". Among the reasons why they did not change to low-dose CT, a priority for high quality images was the top reason among problems of devices and performance. Informed consent was not yet adequate. Conclusions. It is necessary for manufactures to develop better technology to improve the image quality of low-dose CT and to report enough information to clinicians. On the medical side, perception of the necessity for appropriate reduction of radiation dose and the decision to move to low-dose CT would be of crucial significance for facility heads as well as radiologists and technicians.
key words: Ningen Dock (Integrated health check-up), Questionnaire survey, Low-dose CT lung cancer screening, Prevalence blocking factors, CT image quality
JJLC 52 (6): 948-955, 2012
